Levelling The Playing Field For ​Amateur Sports

PPG was commissioned by the Australian Sports Foundation to estimate the ​financial, health, and budgetary impacts of designating amateur sports clubs and ​athletes as having a ‘charitable purpose’.

Published by
Pragmatic Policy Group LLC

Independent economic research & policy analysis.

Commissioned by
GrowSF

Civic advocacy for San Francisco’s future.

Australian Sports Foundation
Contents
Key findings at a glance

Key findings at a glance

The Opportunity

Charitable status could unlock significant new value for grassroots sport

Recognition as a charitable purpose would open a new source of funding for eligible clubs and athletes, with benefits flowing through to participation, community health and government expenditure.

$24M

Ancillary Fund distributions to amateur sport in 2024–25

$103M

Annual distributions to amateur sport by 2029–30

34%

Average annual growth in distributions, 2024–25 to 2029–30

71,864

Amateur sports clubs and athletes that could become eligible

190K+

New sports participants over four years, 2024–25 to 2027–28

$370M

Savings to the Federal health budget, 2024–25 to 2027–28

A New Funding Pathway

Amateur sport could access more than $100 million annually by 2030

Ancillary Funds currently distribute tax-deductible charitable funding through eligible organisations, but amateur sport cannot directly benefit because sport itself is not presently designated as a charitable purpose.

Figure 1: Projected Ancillary Fund distributions to amateur sport ($ million per year)
Distributions grow from around $24 million in 2024–25 to $103 million in 2029–30 as sport ramps up to a 4.5% share of Ancillary Fund distributions by 2028–29.

2024–25

$24M

2025–26

$34M

2026–27

$57M

2027–28

$77M

2028–29

$95M

2029–30

$103M

Note: Projected distributions via the Australian Sports Foundation Charitable Fund (ASFCF), assuming amateur sport is granted charitable-purpose status. Source: PPG, Levelling the Playing Field (February 2024), Chart 1.

A conservative projection: The model assumes sport reaches only 4.5% of Ancillary Fund distributions, around two-thirds of the average share currently received by Arts & Culture charities.

The Fiscal Case

The downstream savings could exceed the cost of additional sports funding

The proposal would not create a new pool of tax deductions. Amateur sport would instead receive a share of charitable giving already flowing through Australia’s Ancillary Fund system. At the same time, increased sports participation could generate substantial healthcare savings for government.

Table 1: Funding, participation and health savings, first year vs 2029–30

Measure

2024–25

2029–30

Sports Funding

$24M

$103M

New Participants

23,849

103,446

Health Savings

$42M

$225M

Note: Sports funding is annual Ancillary Fund distributions to amateur sport; new participants is the number of additional sports participants in that year; health savings are annual reductions in Federal health expenditure. All figures are projections. Source: PPG, Levelling the Playing Field (February 2024), Tables 2–3.

Fiscally responsible reform: The change is projected to leave total ATO tax receipts unchanged while unlocking new grassroots funding and generating substantially larger health-related savings for the Federal Budget.

Related Case Studies